Nigeria’s Tortoise Syndrome: How Politicians Corner Palliatives Meant for All (OPINION) By Isaac Asabor
In the vibrant tapestry of African folklore, few stories resonate as deeply as the tale of the cunning Tortoise. This crafty creature, who cleverly manipulated language to deceive his fellow animals, serves as a timeless reminder of the perils of greed and selfishness. The fable tells of Tortoise joining a group of animals on a journey to solicit for food. When they arrived at their destination, he introduced himself as “All of you.” This deception allowed him to claim every food delivered by their benefactor, who would announce, “This food is for all of you.” Thus, Tortoise greedily consumed the provisions meant for the entire group, leaving his companions hungry and disillusioned.
This ancient tale, though simple, mirrors the tragic reality unfolding in Nigeria today. As the country grapples with economic hardship and widespread poverty, the government’s efforts to distribute palliatives, a supposed lifeline for millions of struggling citizens, are being undermined by the very leaders entrusted to ensure their fair allocation. Just like the Tortoise, a select few politicians are allegedly diverting these resources for their personal gain, despite the fact that they were meant for the masses,
Without any iota of exaggeration, the recent economic crisis in Nigeria has been exacerbated by rising inflation, currency devaluation, and widespread unemployment. In response, the government has rolled out various palliative measures, including the distribution of foodstuffs, financial aid, and other essential resources. These palliatives were intended to ease the burden on ordinary Nigerians, many of whom are barely surviving under the weight of these challenges. However, reports of corruption and mismanagement have cast a dark shadow over these efforts.
In many communities, the promised palliatives are either delayed, insufficient, or completely absent. Yet, in the corridors of power, stories of diversion and hoarding of these resources abound. Much like the Tortoise, these politicians have effectively claimed the palliatives meant for “All of you” by manipulating the distribution process to benefit themselves and their close allies. The result is a growing divide between the haves and the have-nots, with the latter left to fend for themselves in an increasingly harsh economic environment.
The foregoing facts can be reinforced in this context by opining that in recent months that Nigeria has witnessed a surge in allegations surrounding the diversion of palliatives meant for vulnerable citizens during times of crisis. These essential relief materials, often provided by the federal government, are intended to alleviate the sufferings of those affected by disasters, pandemics, or economic downturns. However, accusations of mismanagement, corruption, and political maneuvering have cast a shadow over their distribution.
One notable case revolves around Kano State, where the Chief of Staff to the Governor, Shehu Wada Sagagi, has been accused of diverting federal government palliatives. The opposition party in the state, All Progressives Congress (APC), leveled these allegations against Sagagi, claiming that he played a role in the misallocation of relief materials. In response, Sagagi vehemently denied any wrongdoing, emphasizing that neither his office nor he personally received any allocation for palliative distribution. He labeled the claims as baseless, misleading, and politically motivated.
Sagagi’s defense highlights the need for transparency in palliative distribution. The New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP) government, under which Sagagi serves, insists on clear records of beneficiaries and distribution channels. However, the APC’s accusations appear contradictory, considering their previous praise for the NNPP’s efforts in supporting Kano residents. Some speculate that the APC’s frustration stems from their defeat in the 2023 governorship election, leading them to resort to political stunts.
Beyond Kano, similar allegations have surfaced in other states. For instance, Edo State finds itself embroiled in a heated debate over the alleged diversion of rice meant for vulnerable citizens. The APC has pointed accusing fingers at the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), accusing key affiliates of the party of mismanaging the relief materials.
According to Senator Adams Oshiomhole, during an interview on Channels Television, the state government received 20 truckloads of rice from the federal government and an additional 30,000 bags from the Aliko Dangote Foundation, and diverted them, despite the fact that the palliatives were intended for distribution to vulnerable residents, especially amid reports of rice looting during hunger protests.
The Edo State chapter of the PDP swiftly refuted Oshiomhole’s assertions. Rev. Olu Martins, the Deputy Director of the PDP Governorship Campaign Council, emphasized that there is no evidence to support such claims. According to Martins, neither the federal government nor the Dangote Foundation provided rice donations to the state, saying that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s address on the hunger protests did not mention any palliative rice being sent to Edo State.
There appears to be a missing link as Martins raised critical questions, asking “If 20 trucks of rice were indeed sent to Edo, and if they were truly sent, which ministry handled the distribution?”, and “Where are the documented records of receipt and signing?”
Against the foregoing backdrop, it is expedient to opine in this context that the absence of clear evidence casts doubt on the allegations. Furthermore, Martins clarified that while Dangote may distribute rice through the state government, it is not directly managed by the state.
As the controversy unfolds, transparency and accountability remain paramount. Whether the rice diversion allegations hold true or not, Edo State’s citizens deserve clarity and assurance that relief materials reach those who need them most.
In a state grappling with political tensions and hunger protests, the focus should be on effective governance, unity, and the well-being of its people. Only then can we bridge divides and build a stronger and more resilient Edo State.
Besides the foregoing, introspection into the recent years reveals that during the COVID-19 pandemic that state governments across Nigeria received relief materials from the private sector to distribute to residents affected by the lockdown. These materials included food items like rice, garri, spaghetti, and vegetable oil. However, as the pandemic waned and cases reduced, the relief materials remained stored in warehouses. In October, after the #EndSARS protests, hoodlums discovered the items and looted the warehouses where they were stored away. Notably, one such incident occurred in the Satellite area of Lagos State, where a warehouse containing COVID-19 palliatives was raided. The fact that these materials were still available months after their intended distribution raised questions about transparency and accountability.
In fact, reports indicate that politicians diverted the palliatives for their own gain. In Lagos and other states, the stolen food items were allegedly shared among party loyalists rather than reaching the intended beneficiaries. The situation highlighted the need for better governance, transparency, and effective distribution mechanisms during crises. As Nigerians grappled with hunger and economic challenges, the revelation of hidden warehouses sparked outrage and underscored the importance of holding
Given the foregoing buttressed facts, it is not out of place to opine that the allegations of palliative diversion in Nigeria raise fundamental questions about governance, ethics, and the well-being of citizens. As stakeholders debate the veracity of claims and counterclaims, one thing remains clear: the need for transparency, compassion, and effective distribution mechanisms to ensure that palliatives serve their intended purpose; alleviating sufferings and providing hope in times of crisis.
The implications of this “Tortoise Syndrome” are dire. As trust in government institutions erodes, the social fabric that holds communities together begins to fray. When those in power prioritize their interests over the collective good, it not only undermines the effectiveness of policies designed to alleviate suffering but also fuels resentment and disillusionment among the populace. In a country as diverse and complex as Nigeria, this can have far-reaching consequences, including social unrest and political instability.
The lesson from the Tortoise fable is clear: greed and deception ultimately lead to downfall. If Nigeria is to overcome its current challenges and emerge stronger, its leaders must abandon the selfish tendencies that have plagued the nation for far too long. The palliatives are meant for everyone, not just a privileged few. It is high time that those in power remember this and act accordingly, lest they find themselves alone at a table meant to feed an entire nation.
