If Natasha Is Being Recalled, Who Welcomed Her In Kogi During Ramadan? (OPINION)
By Isaac Asabor
The political atmosphere in Kogi State has been electrified by the unfolding drama surrounding the recall of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan. The controversy has raised fundamental questions about democracy, representation, and the genuine will of the people. One of the most glaring contradictions in this political maneuver is the massive reception she received during her homecoming on Ramadan. If she is truly being recalled due to unpopularity or lack of confidence, then who were the thousands of constituents that thronged out to welcome her?
The recall process, in theory, is a democratic tool meant to hold elected officials accountable. However, in Nigeria, it has often been weaponized by political actors to silence opposition figures. Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, known for her grassroots activism and strong advocacy for the people of Kogi Central, has been at the center of what appears to be a politically motivated attempt to remove her from office. The primary question remains: who are the actual voices behind the recall process, and do they truly represent the will of the people?
A politician under recall is typically one who has lost the trust of his or her constituents. Yet, the images and videos from Natasha’s homecoming during Ramadan paint a starkly different picture. Thousands of supporters lined the streets, chanting her name, waving banners, and demonstrating unwavering loyalty to their senator. The outpouring of love and solidarity was not just symbolic; it was a loud statement rejecting the claims that she no longer had the people’s mandate.
The Ramadan season is one of reflection, unity, and devotion. For such a massive crowd to gather in support of Natasha during this holy period is significant. It underscores the deep connection she has with her people, a connection that seems to contradict the recall narrative. The logical question then is: If the majority of her constituents want her gone, who were the people who celebrated her return?
To understand the recall effort, one must examine the political landscape of Kogi State. It is no secret that Natasha’s rise in politics has been met with fierce resistance from established power blocs. As a woman in a male-dominated political environment, she has shattered several barriers, advocating for development, transparency, and empowerment of the common people. Her advocacy has not always sat well with entrenched political interests, many of whom view her as a threat to the status quo.
Kogi politics is known for its volatility, and Senator Natasha’s recall appears to fit the pattern of politically motivated tactics aimed at silencing formidable opposition figures. Rather than being a genuine expression of the electorate’s dissatisfaction, it is more likely a strategic move by political actors threatened by her growing influence.
Elections and public demonstrations of support are among the most tangible ways to gauge public sentiment. In the 2023 senatorial election, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan secured victory against all odds, defeating an incumbent backed by the ruling establishment. That victory was a testament to the people’s trust in her ability to deliver. Just over a year later, the same people who elected her have come out in their thousands to receive her, further affirming that they still stand with her.
The argument that she has lost the trust of her constituents is weakened by the very public and overwhelming display of support during her homecoming. If a recall is genuinely driven by the people, one would expect to see public outrage, dissatisfaction, and protests against the senator. Instead, the opposite is happening, her people are standing by her in defiance of political maneuvering.
Without a doubt, Nigeria’s recall process is riddled with challenges. While it is meant to empower citizens to remove non-performing lawmakers, in practice, it is often hijacked by political forces with ulterior motives. The process is cumbersome, requiring a high threshold of signatures and verification processes, which are often manipulated.
In previous recall attempts across Nigeria, many have failed because they lacked genuine grassroots support. The attempt to recall Senator Dino Melaye, for example, collapsed because the people he represented did not truly want him gone, despite political forces pushing the agenda. Natasha’s case appears to be heading in the same direction, where a recall is initiated not by the people, but by those who stand to gain politically from her removal.
Against the foregoing backdrop, it is expedient to opine that for democracy to thrive in Nigeria, the people’s mandate must be respected. If a recall process is to be initiated, it should be a true reflection of the electorate’s will, not a tool for political vendetta. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) must ensure that any recall process follows due process and is not hijacked by vested interests.
Furthermore, Natasha’s massive homecoming should serve as a wake-up call to those behind the recall attempt. The people have spoken, and their voices should not be ignored. If she truly lacked their support, the reception she received would have been lukewarm or even hostile. Instead, it was a powerful statement of unity and defiance against attempts to undermine their democratic choice.
The contradiction between the recall efforts and the massive turnout during Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s homecoming in Ramadan raises serious questions about the legitimacy of the process. The people of Kogi Central have shown where they stand, and it is clear that Natasha still enjoys significant support among her constituents.
Those orchestrating the recall must answer a fundamental question: If Natasha is so unpopular, who were the thousands of people that welcomed her back home? Until that question is satisfactorily answered, this recall attempt will remain what many suspect it to be, a politically motivated move that does not reflect the true will of the people.
