Fubara vs. Nwaeke: The Battle for Truth in Rivers State’s Political Crisis (OPINION)
By Sir Churchill E. Ajusah
The recent press conference held by Dr. George Nwaeke, the former Head of the Rivers State Civil Service, has ignited significant controversy and debate within Nigeria’s political landscape. In this briefing, Nwaeke leveled serious accusations against the suspended Governor of Rivers State, Siminalayi Fubara, alleging that Fubara orchestrated the bombing of the State House of Assembly complex in 2023 to thwart impeachment efforts by lawmakers loyal to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike. He further stated that “another attempt was also made to destroy the residential quarters of the House of Assembly members.’ He also asserted “I was shocked and asked myself: how could a man who wants to lead his people be destroying state assets and wasting public funds on a needless ego fight?”
This controversy unfolds amid rising political tensions in Rivers State, fueled by allegations and power struggles, rather than actual security threats; as earlier reports of fires and explosions at oil and gas pipelines in the Niger Delta, initially cited as a justification for the declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State by President Bola Tinubu, have since been debunked. This declaration led to the suspension of Governor Fubara and the appointment of a retired naval officer, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (rtd) as Sole Administrator.
Nwaeke’s decision to resign after the suspension of Gov. Siminalayi Fubara and to hold the press conference just days after his resignation raises questions about his motivations and the potential influence of external factors. The choice of a hotel as the venue, rather than a government facility or press center, adds an element of informality and suggests a possible desire to distance the event from official state apparatus.
During the conference, Nwaeke read from a prepared speech, a common practice intended to ensure clarity and consistency in messaging. However, reports indicate that there were audible prompts from individuals in the background urging him to adhere strictly to the script. Such interjections could imply that Nwaeke was under pressure or guidance from unseen parties, potentially undermining the authenticity of his statements.
Complicating matters further, Nwaeke’s wife alleged in a viral video that he was kidnapped. This assertion introduces a personal dimension to the unfolding drama, hinting at possible coercion or duress influencing Nwaeke’s actions and statements.
In response to Nwaeke’s allegations, Governor Fubara categorically denied any involvement in the bombing of the State House of Assembly. He dismissed the claims as “laughable” and urged the public to disregard them, suggesting that Nwaeke had been compromised and was acting under external influence.
Nwaeke’s revelations, if substantiated, could implicate him as an accomplice in the alleged misconduct, given his prior position and apparent awareness of the events. His decision to speak out post-resignation might be perceived as an attempt to distance himself from potential legal repercussions or to expose wrongdoing from within. However, the circumstances surrounding his disclosures—particularly the timing, venue, and manner of delivery—invite scrutiny regarding his credibility and the veracity of his claims.
The press conference by Dr. George Nwaeke has added complexity to the already volatile political situation in Rivers State. The serious allegations against Governor Fubara, combined with the broader political maneuverings in the region, highlight the complex power struggles at play—especially amid the now-disputed claims of pipeline attacks. As investigations proceed, it remains imperative for all claims to be thoroughly examined to uphold justice and maintain public trust in the state’s governance structures.
By Sir Churchill E. Ajusah, Political and Public Affairs Analyst
